No, Christianity is not under attack in the US


“On Tuesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi hosted an inaugural meeting of a task force consisting of other members of President Donald Trump’s cabinet, to discuss its mission to eradicate alleged “anti-Christian bias” within the federal government.”

LOL! This is just propaganda. There is no “anti-Christian bias” in the US. In fact, there is a pro-Christian bias in the US.

Christmas is a federal holiday. Good Friday is a holiday in 12 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana,Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas. Neither Passover nor any other Jewish holiday is recognized as official federal or state holidays in the United States. Washington State officially recognizes the Muslim Holidays of Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha as state holidays but they are not federal holidays.

Christian churches, just like other faith organizations, are tax-exempt.

The DoJ language identifies opponents of abortion as Christian. While there are certainly Christian sects that oppose abortion (as there are certainly atheists who oppose abortion), there are also pro-choice Christians, including pro-choice Roman Catholics. Jesus was silent on the topic of abortion, 

Likewise, anti-vaxxer, anti-gay and pro-homeschooling are not definably Christian. There are both Christians and non-Christians who subscribe to these views, but Jesus was silent on the topics of vaccines, homosexuality and home schooling.

Creationism is a belief of certain Christian sects, but others are fine with evolution science, including the Christian Roman Catholic Church. Jesus was silent on evolution and the age of the earth.

Look, Christianity is privileged in the US. But that doesn’t seem to be enough for the Trump Administration, which prefers to gaslight those of us who support separation of church and state. Trump doesn’t care about Christianity. He does this to divide Americans.

 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pam-bondi-anti-christian-bias-task-force_l_680a40c0e4b0ce4f6ebacc1f

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more