Conversation with my brother Mike

My brother Mike is a retired mechanical engineer. I lasted nine months as an engineering student in college, but he graduated as an engineer and made a career out of it. A pretty extraordinary feat considering he never used an SI unit in his calculations.

I emailed him two pictures of duck and geese pelotons with birds drafting behind one another and the following (edited) exchange ensued:

Mike: Drafting in a more viscous fluid.  What would Osborne Reynolds say?

Me: He’s dead. Got a Ouija board?

Mike: I think having ones own dimensionless number confers immortality.

Me:  
The Reynolds numbers for 3-, 7-, and 14-day-old ducklings . . . were 2.15 x 10^4, 2.82 x 10^4 [and] 3.60 x 10^4 . . .

I couldn't find a comparable set of measurements for Canadian goslings, but I have to believe they're the same order of magnitude.

 

https://www.wcupa.edu/sciences-mathematics/biology/fFish/documents/1995JEZ-DuckFormation.pdf


This is the money graf:

"The results of this study indicate that the least energetic effort is expended by the most posterior duckling in formation. Compared to a solitary duckling, trailing ducklings had values of AZ that were 3.4- 20.0% lower than leading ducklings with and without the decoy's wake. This finding suggests that the trailing duckling swims in a flow field different from the more anterior ducklings."

So even at high Reynolds number, drafting makes a difference. Not sure the same would be true for the E. coli swimming nearby.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ruble is collapsing

Saving Ryan

The price of Trump’s war on universities