Yes, they’re coming for Social Security


During his campaign, Donald Trump “promised” not to touch Social Security and to veto and law that modified the program. That “promise” is about to be tested.

“Lee's attack has four basic components. One is to bemoan the fact that Social Security is funded mostly by a tax, which he asserts the government can use for any purpose — not necessarily to cover retirement and disability benefits.”

Wrong. SS taxes can only be used to cover retirement and disability benefits. Lee is flat out lying here.

 

“Another is to point out that the program's reserves aren't stored in individual accounts with workers' names on them, but collected in "a huge account called the 'Social Security Trust Fund.'"

He’s correct here. Social Security is insurance and that’s how insurance works. Your premiums aren’t stored in individual accounts, they’re invested to make profits for the insurance company so that when you make a claim, there’s money to pay it.

“A third is to claim that "the government routinely raids this fund. ... They take 'your money'” and use it for whatever the current Congress deems 'necessary.'"

He's lying. Congress doesn’t “take” your money, it borrows it. Any funds in excess of the amounts transferred to current beneficiaries goes into the Trust Fund, which by law is invested in special treasuries that cannot be traded on the open market and that are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.

“And a fourth is to complain that the trust fund is mismanaged: "If you had put the same amount into literally ANYTHING else — a mutual fund, real estate, even a savings account — you’d be better off by the time you reached retirement age, even if the government kept some of it!" He states: "Your 'investment' in Social Security can give you a return lower than inflation."”

This is specious. Social Security isn’t enforced investment, it’s insurance. And how much you get back depends on how much you put in and how long you live.


Look for Trump to repudiate Mike Lee and Elon Musk co-terminus with the first verified report of porcine aviation. I don’t know whether their plans to destroy Social Security will make it through Congress, but if they do, Trump *will* sign the bill.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/column-gop-musk-unveil-threat-221131683.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more