Lies, damned lies and RFK Jr.


RFK Jr continues in his crackpot crusade against fluoridated water. There is *zero* evidence that artificial fluoridation of water at or below the approved level (0.7 mg/liter) has any pathological consequences. Why do we fluoridate public water?

“Bacteria in the mouth that serve to break down food also create acids that degrade the enamel on the surface of the teeth. Fluoride strengthens teeth and prevents cavities by countering the acid damage caused by the bacteria. Water fluoridation reduces tooth decay by about 25% in children and adults and has a greater benefit (66% decrease) in children who have fluoride exposure before they develop their teeth. Fluoride also prevents other downstream dental complications like infections and abscesses that can lead to heart disease and other chronic health problems.”

Yes, there are fluoridated toothpastes and mouth rinses, and fluoride treatments (I’ve had them) are available at dentists’ offices. Of course, affluent people like RFK Jr., Trump and other Americans of privilege point to these alternatives while ignoring the fact that millions of Americans don’t have access to their wealth.

“Profound disparities in oral health exist for some population subgroups, such as the poor, older adults, and many members of racial and ethnic minority groups. According to multiple national surveys, children in low-income families were twice as likely to have decay in their primary (baby) teeth as children from families with high incomes. Access to professional dentistry and/or fluoride-enriched toothpaste or mouth rinse may not be available to vulnerable groups or those living in poverty.

 

“Water fluoridation is the most cost-effective and accessible way to provide fluoride community-wide. The CDC reports that every $1 spent on fluoridation nets a community average of $32 per person per year by avoiding treatment for dental cavities. In a city the size of Chicago (2.7 million population), that is a return on investment of approximately $85 million per year. A majority of the U.S. population gets water from a fluoridated public source, which ensures over 200 million Americans reap the benefits of fluoridation, regardless of their income, health status, or age.”


Opposed to public water fluoridation? Check your privilege. 

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/113233?xid=nl_secondopinion_2024-12-08&mh=eb71348a5ff6ae370cc6759bc5dc3300

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more