What's in an epithet?



For as long as I've been aware, the American right has accused those who disagree with them of being "socialists" or "communists." This was certainly the strategy of Sen. Joe McCarthy, who used it reflexively.

I've spent a lot of time reading about "socialism" and "communism," having read histories of Russia, the Soviet Union, the Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution, as well as biographies of Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao and Castro.

Once you educate yourself, you learn that the governments of the USSR and Red China and their satellites weren't socialist or communist, they are autocratic dictatorships. They used "socialism" and "communism" as branding to disguise their totalitarianism. And the West was complicit, by using "socialist" and "communist" as synonyms for totalitarianism, even while embracing dictators who were allies.

Look, if you actually read and understand Marx, what Mao and Lenin et al. did was anathema to Marxism, which taught that socialism only emerges from an industrialized society, which neither Boshevik Russian nor Mao's China was. The first step to understanding history is to discard phony labels and call things what they are.

Today, the GOP continues the grand tradition of using "socialist," "communist" and "Marxist" as epithets to smear their political opponents, regardless of their actual philosophy. The idea that Joe Biden is a Marxist would make a dog laugh. Biden is what we used to call a "Rockefeller Republican." Yet here is Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) in a text message to Mark Meadows:

"Mark, When we lose Trump we lose our Republic. Fight like hell and find a way. We’re with you down here in Texas and refuse to live under a corrupt Marxist dictatorship. Liberty! Babin"

For an alcoholic, the first step to a cure is admitting you have a problem you can't control. The GOP is addicted to Trumpism and the bleating of "Marxist" at anything they disagree with. Babin, Meadows and their fellow Trump supporters nearly succeeded in a violent coup to overturn their country's government. That's not Marxism, but it is Bolshevism or Maoism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more