BS

 A friend sent me a link to a Substack article (URL below) about BS. Herewith was my email reply:

Interesting. Thanks for sharing. We got Newsweek at our house when I was growing up, and after I got married, we subscribed for a decade or two. Eventually, we stopped the subscription, as we later did the dead tree newspaper, because I could get faster news and better analysis on the intertubes. Time and Newsweek are zombies.Humanity has always been awash in BS. Hundreds of millions died because of the BS of the popes, the various European empires and their colonies, the Confederacy, Stalinism, Maoism, Naziism and other manifestations of tribal BS. In my time, Wm F Buckley Jr was one of the more erudite American BS purveyors, both through the National Review and on TV. But there was the John Birch Society, Fr. Coughlin, and eventually, Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich. Fox News has taken BS to a whole new level. I used to have hope for the internet as the sterilizing sunlight to exterminate BS, but BS has bloomed in profusion with the web alongslide real information, and most folks lack the critical thinking skills to tell the difference.At its core, the problem with BS is that it appeals to those who seek arguments from authority. That certainly explains the appeal of the BS of organized religions. And only when I embarked on a career in research did I really abandon arguments from authority for arguments from evidence. Now, I find it relatively easy to dodge the miasma of BS and research the evidence. Over time, I've found sources that have repaid my trust, but as St. Ronnie was fond of bleating: "Trust, but verify."I just finished reading "Spin Dictators: The changing face of tyranny in the 21st century." While the writing can be tedious, the central point--buttressed by plenty of citations--is that the trend overall is away from fear dictators and towards spin (i.e., BS) dictators. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more