Water desalination

 Santa Barbara is about to go online with a water desalination plant that will provide 30% of the city’s needs. This prompted the recollection that my dad worked for years on water desalination, even consulting after retirement. According to my brother Mike, he foresaw that the approach he was researching—boiling and condensation—would be overtaken by reverse osmosis, which is indeed what the Santa Barbara plant uses. Mike also sent me a link to a 1991 LA Times article that quotes our dad:

“The research was funded primarily by the Atomic Energy Commission, which was looking for uses for what it expected to be cheap energy produced by nuclear power plants, and by the Department of Interior, which foresaw water shortages in the West.
“Somewhere along the way, the Department of Interior lost interest, partly because the California Water Project (which brings water to Southern California from the North) was under way and it was thought that it would relieve the water shortage,” said chemical engineer David Eissenberg of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. Cheap atomic energy also proved to be an illusion. “The funds dried up and nothing much has happened since then,” Eissenberg said.”
*snip*
“The so-called multistage flash distillation plants in the Middle East use a variety of tricks developed in U.S. laboratories--including recapturing the heat given off when steam condenses and carrying out part of the evaporation at lowered pressures--to produce about eight or nine pounds of water per 1,000 BTUs.
The efficiency of such plants can be boosted to as much as 13 pounds of water per 1,000 BTUs, but the Saudis and other nations rich in natural gas have not seen the need to pursue high efficiencies.
“The Saudis are very conservative in design and operation,” said Oak Ridge’s Eissenberg. “They’re not interested in improving the design, but in replicating a proven design.” https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-02-18-mn-1197-story.html?fbclid=IwAR1PGYb3jdE4PaUmo8DuFexcJXpfIg-HV4A-zFzTZuinywykYXHZPZuN_NI

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more