Putin and Ukraine

 Think Putin is playing 11 dimensional chess in Ukraine? Think again. Lifted from a comment thread over at jabberwocking.com:

"Think of what an ideal structure would be to ensure that somebody running a vast organization has access to the information, perspectives, projections, modeling, and feedback to make proper decisions. It would need independent consultants, institutional structures to quality check information, relevant metrics, public feedback, ways to identify and elevate new ideas, trustworthy and longitudinal data collection systems, and accountability for mistakes. Does that look anything like Russia?
"Putin suffers from all the problems of an out-of-touch CEO--he's surrounded by cronies whose advancement is tethered to how much they praise their leader--without any of the institutional safeguards. He has no board of directors, no stock price to let him know how his company is doing, no accountants or external benchmarks. Worse, he has to deal with the fact that he can't actually rely on or fully trust his adjutants and oligarchs, because he knows that some or all of them are just a cup of polonium tea away from replacing him.
"And that's on top of the fact that his whole gangster-state system absolutely depends flooding a vast media system with noise, bullshit, and propaganda to which of course _Putin is not immune_.
"Under such a situation, how could Putin do otherwise than to make terrible decisions? Even if he wanted to be a benevolent ruler of Russia (and by all accounts, he doesn't), there's no reason that he could.
"We all wonder what genius game Putin is playing, when in reality, this is exactly what autocrats do: make stupid destructive moves that the rest of us are either harmed with or have to clean up."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more