Facebook/Meta

 Facebook has certainly become a popular whipping boy these days. And I have had issues with FB, primarily with the tortured use of "community standards" by the right-leaning moderators who punish those of us who dare criticize the right-wing extremists in government and society. And FB has only recently started cracking down on anti-vax disinformation and on Trump and others who advocate overturning election results.

For me personally, mostly FB has been a good thing. I've met new people on FB and keep in touch with friends. I enjoy seeing pictures and funny memes that people share. And even being blocked by those right-wing moderators had a positive dividend: it forced me to start my own blog. FB isn't a source of evil, it is an amplifier of the evil that already exists in American culture. Here's Kevin Drum: " . . . the bulk of the (limited) evidence to date suggests that social media doesn't cause hostility, it merely reflects hostility that's always been there but that most of us never noticed.

"Now, I think you can still argue that there's a second order effect here: Merely being exposed to so much more hostility may have a negative effect on society. I'm open to that idea. However, is there really any question that the intense political hostility we face today started way back in 2000, or perhaps 2010 at the absolute latest? And therefore something else has to be at the root of it, with social media playing, at most, a modest supporting role in later years?" https://jabberwocking.com/facebook-is-a-reflection-of-society-not-an-agitator/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two sides

Image
  Yes, there are two sides to every question. In most cases, there is a correct side and a wrong side. In the case of Kamala Harris, the correct side is that she was born a US citizen. The wrong side is that her parents had to be citizens or permanent residents for her to be a citizen. President Trump pretended to be unsure about this, just as he pretended for five years that Barack Obama is not a citizen. In the case of the Harris noncitizen claim, it is backed by the racist C laremont Institute: "The Claremont Institute masquerades as an intellectual salon of the right, but it is really just a racist fever swamp with deep connections to the conspiratorial alt-right. It even granted a fellowship to Jack Posobiec, who helped promote the notorious Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Claremont’s resident bigots offer deranged fantasies of violently expelling Americans from their home country because of their ethnic backgrounds. Their work deserves the intellectual weight given to that of D...
Read more

Who chooses?

Over at jabberwocking.com , Kevin Drum blames pro-choice writers for failing to make the case for reproductive choice. Well, from everything I've read, a clear majority of Americans believe that Roe should still stand. Seems like the case has been made, and if we lived in a truly representative democracy, a limited national right to abortion would be preserved. But beyond that reality, I think Drum has it exactly backwards. Why does the burden of proof fall on those advocating for personal autonomy? Seems to me the null hypothesis is that women should be allowed to make decisions about their own health, and that the justification for nanny state intrusion into such decisions rests with the minority who assert state coercion. Democrats need to hammer on the right-wing GOP to explain why the government takes temporary custody of pregnant Americans. https://jabberwocking.com/liberals-really-suck-at-defending-abortion/
Read more

Black Earth

 Just finished reading “Black Earth: The Holocaust as history and warning” by Timothy Snyder. It is a detailed account of the Holocaust, as well as an effort to abstract lessons from this history for our time. Like his book “Bloodlands,” Snyder’s “Black Earth” makes for painful reading. As the grandson of a Ukrainian Jew and the son of a Jew, I would have been targeted in the Holocaust had I been in the wrong place. I had read several histories of Europe in World War II that included the Holocaust. I knew the basic story of the Holocaust and Hitler’s anti-Semitic vision. I learned a great deal by reading this book. I won’t belabor the ghoulish atrocities committed by the Nazis and their collaborators. To summarize them here would be to trivialize the enormity of the crimes and invite pointless debate about who did what and who suffered more. You’ll have to read the book to understand Snyder’s historical insights. However, I learned many things that I did not know by reading thi...
Read more